ABOUT AGE OF UNIVERSE. AO Koreysha (Report made at the 1996 international conference on the 150th anniversary of the Odessa Observatory). Abstract. Accounting for the spherical shape of the observed boundaries of the universe formed is clearly observed compact objects, it is necessary to assess the size of the universe, which it reached 10-20 billion years ago. This is in sharp contrast with the ideas of modern relativistic theory. Amendment to 10-20 billion years is related to interval of time it takes light to spread it on the horizon of the universe to us, which increases the age of the universe in 10 – 20 billion, passed today in astrophysics, at least up to 20-40 billion years. As a consequence, Hubble parameter is reduced by half.
This leads to disastrous consequences for the relativistic concept and leads to a contradiction with the model of an expanding universe. There are two concepts that are fundamental importance in modern astrophysics. The first is closely related to the finite speed of light so that the information received from distant stars corresponds to the time required to overcome distance from the observed stars to us. In other words, we see distant lights as they were in the past with respect to the time of receiving information from them with light. This fact is not debatable. (See (1)). The second concept is more complicated is the fact that the universe is measured from the hypothetical Big Bang (Big Bang) to the present. Redshift of galaxies outside the Milky Way points to the age of the universe.
The reason was a result, the investigation – the cause. Dialectical system in its development process can be either in a state of dynamic equilibrium, which guarantees the equality of opposites, or, in violation of the equality of status 'Combat', whose purpose – to level the opposition, to bring the system into equilibrium. Equality levels of quality species and its environment, which in the limit can be simplified view, the confrontation with data, there equality of opposites dialectic of 'species-habitat'. A change in one level of quality relative to the other is the birth of one of the unbalanced opposites, that is the reason birth 'control' over its antipode to restore a balance, 'control', in which the opposite of its part of the unbalanced birth to what is causing the birth of 'control' the opposition for the first rebalancing of the system. Here the notion of 'counter' reflects the tendency of species in the direction of improving its quality through the elimination of predominantly low-grade populations.
Moreover, intensity of 'struggle' is that, as a rule, the number of individuals are eliminated does not exceed the number of births – the intensity, which is determined by the deviation of exact state of equilibrium 'species-environment'. Reducing the level of quantitative prey species is also a deviation from the equilibrium state of 'species-environment', but as a rule, this deviation is transcendent, ie, In this case, the number of eliminated population exceeds the number of births. The rate of development of the dialectical systems – (rate of occurrence of all processes of nature) – is determined by the degree of intensity 'struggle' of opposites of these systems.