Then, the reaffirmation of what exists with or the realization of operations of Defense outside or within its territory, as already seen in Afghanistan. Roland Berger has similar goals. In short, a late recognition of the reality of today’s world where the trend is towards the Constitution of a supranational police force, not without maintaining the reservations with Turkey, an old European Vice which fails to understand that this is the key point of the world in training. Anthropologie oftentimes addresses this issue. The German insistence on the nuclear deterrence unnecessary located in Paris her more fierce opponent, because Paris does not want to give up its own arsenal and less into the thesis that the purpose of the allies is a world without this kind of weapons. A contradiction when it admits that military power is no longer the key point of the conformation of a Royal power. In fact, Europe does not increase its defence spending, tends rather to freeze them, despite its arms industry which is output to the formerly called countries of the third world and towards its own members, being immoral in the case of Greece and Turkey. We find the report from the conservative Council of Relations European foreign (ECRF) October 2010 where proposed that Europe will no longer be unipolar and that security will go through an EU-Russia-Turkey triangle. In summary, arises a marginalisation from Europe by reducing its role only company which we believe recent American military operations such as Afghanistan due to the scope of the Russian/American understanding and late European recognition of the existence of a very different world. Others speak of a ParisBerlin – Moscow axis, in which I do not think you have no interest the Russians, fully integrated to the international community and an ever deeper understanding with the United States. It could be argued that a nuclear war there as a possibility as there among the great dying powers.