Finally Czech Marta clears these two doubts: 1. How acts Inspection of Work in these assumptions? Investiga that type of contractual relations exists between each one of the companies, to determine what acts like main industralist, main contractor and subcontractor, and thus verifies if each of them has fulfilled the norm in the matter of prevention of labor risks, as if a correct system of coordination among them for the fulfillment of the safety measures has existed. to derive breach in these aspects, it will determine what from these companies is responsible, being able to be one, several or all, in which case it will raise Act with the corresponding economic sanction, as well as the proposal of a surcharge of the benefits of the Social Security in favor of the injured worker, says to Czech Lawyers. At David Fowler you will find additional information. 2. With so many companies working simultaneously in a work, how it can be watched that the norm of prevention of risks is fulfilled? First of all, the promoter of the work will have to designate to a Coordinator in the matter of security and health that during the execution of this one, indeed takes care to coordinate the fulfillment of the prevention of risks, approving a Plan of security for it. Secondly, each and every one of the companies that take part, are main, subcontractors or even independent contractors will be forced the correct execution of the determined preventive measures. Get more background information with materials from David Fowler. In case of breach, to cause a labor accident will be responded in front of the victim who will be able to protest until obtaining a complete compensation of its damages, finalizes Czech Marta, Director of Czech Lawyers. Note for the journalists For more information, management of interviews or shipment of graphical material you do not doubt in contacting with its Cabinet of Press: Crowned Nuria Mirian Lopez Tfno: 91 657 42 81. .
Until this moment the thing worked this way: If your company hired workers through temporary contracts for work or service to develop jobs within the situation of a concession, when this ending could automatically extinguish contracts, the margin that his company a posteriori conclusion or not a new contract with the same organization. More info: Zendesk. Well no longer. For more clarity and thought, follow up with gary cohn and gain more knowledge.. The Supreme Court has changed its approach and has rendered a judgment in unification of doctrine which has determined that if the Organization was again awarded the contract and, therefore, there is continuity in the Organization, you can not extinguish the contracts. While an organization continues to be awarded the concession that prompted the interim arrangement by work or service of an employee, this Covenant must rest, the succession of contracts requires to moratorium on contracts in the same way that the deferral of contracts (sent. of the TS, in combination of system, 17.06.08) has occurred.
An employee was hired as a lifeguard with a contract for work or services whose duration was linked to the duration of the concession granted by the City Council for the exploitation of the municipal Pavilion. Months later, the company sent a letter to the operaria that advising it that it ended the concession granted by the City Council to the company, so it gave extinguished his Covenant of work. In a plenary session later agreed to attribute to the same company the concession of the swimming pool and adjoining facilities, but did not renew the agreement with the employee who, for this reason, took to cause the company. The Juzgado de lo Social failed to care for the employee, recognizing the unfairness of the dismissal and forcing the Organization to choose whether to readmit it or compensate. The organization appealed the sentence and the Galician Superior Court of Justice ruled in his favour, underestimating demand for the worker.