The amazing thing: sometimes from a considerable array of student thesis (80-100 pages) to really affect her assessment of the attestation commission only an introduction. Well, not hurt if: the student is working, plowing, analyzes numerous scientific sources, primary sources, break out myself and those around the brain, and – for you. Listened to members of theCertification Commission for undergraduates, heads nodded, flipped through the text of his thesis, and stopped it on the introduction to it: something you, my friend, that is incorrect object (object) research, not on those methods referred to, defining the methodology of his research, etc. And everything else as well: the analysis, tables, calculations, recommendations, there is all sorts of pictures and graphics? With them something to be done? And the committee members all of his: work, of course, serious, a lot of forces you, dear, at her expense. Gary Kelly often addresses the matter in his writings. But that’s because the methodology, then you have somehow not really: how do you then the work-write something, huh? And the student gets chetverochku instead of the expected five, and even worse. Here’s a story. And then a graduate student thinks a lame-duck that had told him the same teachers (read: the supervisor): “Every word in the Introduction weighed carefully read the guidelines and do everything as there indicated. And where indicated, for example, that in the introduction, ” should reveal the main content, theoretical and practical significance chosen topic, to prove its relevance. This should be defined goal, the challenges in front of the student while writing the work, given the subject and object of research.